|
(Continued from page 3)
Identification of
the CAP subunit that interacts with RNA polymerase at the lac promoter
by "oriented heterodimers". Zhou et al., Cell
73:375,
1993. Notice the use of the
previously isolated CAP mutants altered in DNA binding (E181V) and
in transcription activation (T158A). How are the heterodimers prepared
in vivo and in vitro?
The role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in CAP-dependent
transcription activation at the lac promoter. Igarashi and Ishihama,
Cell 65:1015,
1991. Be able to explain
how reconstituted RNA polymerase is made. Draw a cartoon depicting
the mechanism of CAP-dependent transcription activation of the lac
promoter that takes into account the experiments in this and the
previous paper.
Summary of the roles of the
subunits of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition and transcriptional
activation at different promoters.
Busby and Ebright, Cell 79:743,
1994. Notice that the
alpha subunit's C-terminal domain binds to a third promoter recognition
element, "UP", in certain strong promoters, e.g., promoters for
rRNA genes. Also, note that sometimes the DNA binding site
for a transcription activator, e.g., lambda repressor, overlaps
the -35 promoter hexamer (rather than lying upstream) and that when
residing there, the activator may make contact with another surface
on RNA polymerase than the alpha subunit's C-terminal domain. See
also the review by Busby and Ebright. J.
Mol. Biol. 293:199, 1999.
Lecture by Dr. Wolf.
Transcription
activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters. Niu
et al.,
Cell
87:1123-1134, 1996. How were mutants defective in transcription
activation at class II promoters isolated? What is alanine scanning
mutagenesis and what was learned by applying it to characterization
of AR2? What other biochemical approaches were used to demonstrate
that AR2 functions through protein-protein interactions with RNA
polymerase and how was the target on RNAP identified? How was it
determined that AR1 and AR2 affect different steps in CAP-dependent
transcription activation?
Crystal structure
of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex. Benoff et al., Science
297:1562-1566. Structural confirmation of the protein-protein
and protein-DNA contacts made by CAP and the alpha-CTD in ternary
complexes as inferred from genetic and biochemical analyses.
Functional interactions
between the alphaCTD of RNAP and sigma70 at UP-element and activator-dependent
promoters. Chen et al., Mol.
Cell. 11:1621, 2003. Summarized by Dr. Wolf.
5. Transcription activation by pre-recruitment.
Recruitment vs.
post-recruitment. Ptashne
and Gann, Nature 386:569-577,
1997. These two mechanisms are summarized and examples are given.
Recruitment is the
mechanism by which MelR activates transcription of the melAB
promoter . Grainger
et al. J.
Bacteriol. 186:6938-6943, 2004. Convincing
in vivo evidence for recruitment using chromatin immunoprecipitation
(ChIP).
Initial
evidence for pre-recruitment as a new mechanism of transcription
activation. Griffith, Shah, et al., Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 291:979-986,
2002. What is the key argument supporting the existence of the
pre-recruitment mechanism? Are there alternative explanations and
how can the model be tested?
Genetic evidence for pre-recruitment. Griffith and Wolf,
J. Mol. Biol.
344:1-10, 2004. What is the genetic evidence? How good is it?
What else is needed?
Target
site on RNA polymerase for interaction with SoxS during binary complex
formation and the physiological consequence of this interaction.
Shah and Wolf, J. Mol. Biol. 343:513-532,
2004. What is the yeast two-hybrid system and how was it used
to identify the protein-protein interactions between SoxS and RNA
polymerase? Does data from this system assure that the same interactions
occur in E. coli? What is the affinity immobilization assay? What
role does induction of SoxS synthesis play in regulation of rRNA
synthesis during oxidative stress? Does this make sense physiologically?
In other words, does this "redeployment" increase the chance that
the cell will survive the stress?
|