|
(Continued from page 2)
Models for repressor-operator
interaction. Summarized by Dr. Wolf, using handouts.
CAP protein mutants
altered in DNA binding. Ebright et al., Nature
311:232,
1984. Concentrate on the genetic selection employed and the
properties of the mutants rather than on the model building speculations.
Why did the authors map their mutations genetically, rather than
just sequencing them?
Additional techniques
of molecular genetics.((Methods II. A set of handouts will be used by Dr.
Wolf to describe: (i) the chain-termination (Sanger) method of DNA sequencing (ii) initial "large scale" DNA sequencing; (iii)
first generation automated DNA sequencing; (iv) PCR and applications to cloning, e.g., "add-on" PCR; (v) mutagenesis
("QuikChange"), and gene construction ("soeing"). (v) The Gibson Assembly method of DNA cloning, both the short and complete methodology; (vi) Next generation sequencing, the Illumina method.
The basis for DNA binding specificity by CAP using the "loss
of contact" approach. Ebright et al., Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 84:6083, 1987.
Be prepared to relate the in vitro data in this paper for
wild type CAP and the mutant CAP' proteins to the in vivo
properties of the wild type and mutant proteins.
3. Protein-protein
interactions in the lac operon: the mechanism of transcription activation
by CAP.
Isolation of CAP mutants defective
in transcription activation. Zhou et al., Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 90:6081,
1993. Pay particular attention
to the genetic selection and the assays for DNA binding and DNA
bending.
Identification of
the CAP subunit that interacts with RNA polymerase at the lac promoter
by "oriented heterodimers". Zhou et al., Cell 73:375,
1993. Notice the use of the
previously isolated CAP mutants altered in DNA binding (E181V) and
in transcription activation (T158A). How are the heterodimers prepared in vivo and in vitro?
The role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in CAP-dependent
transcription activation at the lac promoter. Igarashi and Ishihama, Cell 65:1015,
1991. Be able to explain
how reconstituted RNA polymerase is made. Draw a cartoon depicting
the mechanism of CAP-dependent transcription activation of the lac promoter that takes into account the experiments in this and the
previous paper.
Summary of the roles of the
subunits of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition and transcriptional
activation at different promoters.
Busby and Ebright, Cell 79:743,
1994. Notice that the
alpha subunit's C-terminal domain binds to a third promoter recognition
element, "UP", in certain strong promoters, e.g., promoters for
rRNA genes. Also, note that sometimes the DNA binding site
for a transcription activator, e.g., lambda repressor, overlaps
the -35 promoter hexamer (rather than lying upstream) and that when
residing there, the activator may make contact with another surface
on RNA polymerase than the alpha subunit's C-terminal domain. See
also the review by Busby and Ebright. J.
Mol. Biol. 293:199, 1999.
Lecture by Dr. Wolf.
Transcription
activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters. Niu et al., Cell
87:1123-1134, 1996. How were mutants defective in transcription
activation at class II promoters isolated? What is alanine scanning
mutagenesis and what was learned by applying it to characterization
of AR2? What other biochemical approaches were used to demonstrate
that AR2 functions through protein-protein interactions with RNA
polymerase and how was the target on RNAP identified? How was it
determined that AR1 and AR2 affect different steps in CAP-dependent
transcription activation?
Crystal structure
of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex. Benoff et al., Science
297:1562-1566. Structural confirmation of the protein-protein
and protein-DNA contacts made by CAP and the alpha-CTD in ternary
complexes as inferred from genetic and biochemical analyses.
Functional interactions
between the alphaCTD of RNAP and sigma70 at UP-element and activator-dependent
promoters. Chen et al., Mol.
Cell. 11:1621, 2003. Summarized by Dr. Wolf.
(Continued on page 4)
|
|