Collection of contaminated sediments from Hunters Point, San Francisco Bay 
         
         Clam in PCB-contaminated sediment
         | 
        IN SITU STABILIZATION OF PERSISTENT ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN MARINE SEDIMENTS 
	 Investigators: Richard G. Luthy (Stanford), Upal Ghosh (UMBC), Richard N.
	     Zare (Stanford), Todd S. Bridges(WES) 
Duration: October 2000 - March 2004.
           Funding agency: Strategic Environmental Research and Developmental Program (DoD)  
        Background. Effective management of polychlorinated biphenyls
          (PCBs) in sediments is challenging and expensive. Hydrophobic organic
          compounds (HOCs) such as PCBs, PAHs, and DDT associate with fine-grained,
          organic-rich, sediment material. This serves as a contaminant reservoir
          in shallow estuarine and coastal regions from which fish and bottom-dwelling
          organisms accumulate toxic compounds passed up the food chain. However,
          recent work by our group and others proposes that the bioavailability
          of hydrophobic organic contaminants depends on how weakly or strongly
          they are sorbed
          to sediment
          organic matter. We find that black carbon particles in a wide variety
          of sediments act as strong sorbents, which naturally over time tend
          to concentrate HOCs and make these compounds less available for organisms.
          Building on these observations, we have tested a new concept for sediment
          management based on addition of activated carbon to sediment to repartition
          hydrophobic organic compounds in the sediment, reducing biological
          uptake and leaching into the overlying water.           
		 
		  Research Objectives. The objectives of the research are to investigate:
 1.	How are PAHs and PCBs distributed among marine sediment particle types? 
2.	How does the aqueous availability of PAHs and PCBs depend on the nature
  of the marine sediment particle types and character of the sorbent organic
  matter? 
 
3.	What form of coal-derived material (coke, activated
  carbon) provides the right balance between material cost and sorption capacity
  for PAHs/PCBs?
 
4.	How does the introduction of a sorbent material affect the phase transfer
  of PAHs and PCBs from marine sediment and thereby
  reduce
  the
  aqueous availability of the organic contaminants?  
5.	How does the addition of
  a sorbent material to sediment reduce the impact of PAHs and PCBs and benefit
  the survival, growth,
  and reproduction of marine organisms?  
 |