Table of Contents: Volume I
The Author's Preface.
The Exterior Form of North America
Origin of the Anglo-Americans, and the Importance of this Origin
in Relation to their Future Condition.
Social Condition of the Anglo-Americans.
The Principle of the Sovereignty of the People of North America.
The Necessity of Examining the Condition of the States Before that
of the Union at Large.
Judicial Power in the United States and its Influence on Political
Society.
Political Jurisdiction in The United States.
The Federal Constitution.
How it can be Strictly Said That the People Govern in The United
States.
Liberty of the Press in The United States.
Political Associations in The United States.
Government of the Democracy in The United States.
What are the Advantages which American Society Derives from a Democratic
Government?
Unlimited Power of the Majority in The United States, and its Consequences.
Causes which Mitigate the Tyranny of the Majority in The United
States.
Principal Causes which Serve to Maintain the Democratic Republic
in The United States.
The Present and Probably Future Condition of the Three Races that
Inhabit the Territory of The United States.
Table of Contents: Volume II (abridged)
Section I: Influence of Democracy on the Action of Intellect in The
United States.
Philosophical Method
of The Americans.
Of the Principal Source
of Belief Among Democratic Nations.
Why the Americans Show
More General Aptitude and Taste for General Ideas that their Forefathers,
The English.
Why the Americans have
never been so Eager as the French for General Ideas in Political Affairs.
How Religion in The United
States Avails itself of Democratic Tendencies.
The Progress of Roman
Catholicism in The United States,
How Equality Suggests
to the Americans the Indefinite Perfectibility of Man.
The Example of the Americans
does not Prove that a Democratic People can have no Aptitude
and no Taste for Science, Literature, or Art.
Why the Americans are
more Addicted to Practical rather than Theoretical Science.
How American Democracy
has Modified the English Language.
Section 2: Influence of Democracy on the Feelings of Americans.
Why Democratic Nations
Show a more Ardent and Enduring Love of Equality than of Liberty.
Of Individualism in Democratic
Countries.
Individualism Strong
at the Close of a Democratic Revolution than at Other Periods.
That the Americans Combat
the Effects of Individualism with Free Institutions.
Of the Uses which the
Americans Make of Public Associations.
Of the Relation of Public
Associations and the Newspapers.
Relation of Civil to
Political Associations.
How the Americans Combat
Individualism by the Principle of Self-Interest Rightly Understood.
That the Americans Apply
the Principle of Self-interest Rightly Understood to Religions Matters.
Of the Taste for Physical
Well-being in America.
Peculiar Effects of the
Love of Physical Gratification in Democratic Times.
Why Some Americans Manifest
a Sort of Spiritual Fanaticism.
Why the Americans are
so Restless in the Midst of their Prosperity.
How the Taste for Physical
Gratification's is United in America to Love of Freedom and Attention
to Public Affairs.
How Religious Belief
Sometimes Turns Americans to Immaterial Pleasures.
Why Among the Americans
All Honest Callings are Considered Honorable.
How an Aristocracy may
be Created by Manufactures.
Section 3: Influence of Democracy on Manners Properly so Called.
How Customs are Softened
as Social Conditions become more Equal.
How Democracy Renders
the Social Intercourse of the Americans Free and Easy.
Why the Americans Show
so Little Sensitiveness in their own Country and are so Sensitive in Europe.
How Democracy Affects
the Relations of Masters and Servants.
How the Principle of
Equality Naturally Divides the Americans into a Multitude of Small Circles.
Why the National Vanity
of the Americans is more Restless and Captious than that of the English.
Why Democratic Nations
Naturally Desire Peace, and Democratic Armies, War.
Causes Which Render Democratic
Armies Weaker than Other Armies at the Outset of a Campaign,
and More Formidable in Protracted Warfare.
Section 4: Influence of Democratic Ideas and Feelings on Political
Society.
Influence of Democratic
Ideas and Feelings on Political Society.
That the Opinions of
Democratic Nations about Government are Naturally Favorable
to the Concentration of Power.
That the Sentiments of
Democratic Nations Accord with their Opinions in Leading them
to Concentrate Political Power.
Of Certain Peculiar and
Accidental Causes which either Lead a People to Complete
the Centralization of Government or Divert them from it.
That Among the European
Nations of our Time the Sovereign Power is Increasing,
Although the Sovereigns are Less Stable.
What sort of Despotism
Democratic Nations have to Fear.
AUTHOR'S INTRODUCTION
Among the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of condition among the people. I readily discovered the prodigious influence that this primary fact exercises on the whole course of society; it gives a peculiar direction to public opinion and a peculiar tenor to the laws; it imparts new maxims to the governing authorities and peculiar habits to the governed.
I soon perceived that the influence of this fact extends far beyond the political character and the laws of the country, and that it has no less effect on civil society than on the government; it creates opinions, gives birth to new sentiments, founds novel customs, and modifies whatever it does not produce. The more I advanced in the study of American society, the more I perceived that this equality of condition is the fundamental fact from which all others seem to be derived and the central point at which all my observations constantly terminated.
I then turned my thoughts to our own hemisphere, and thought that I discerned there something analogous to the spectacle which the New World presented to me. I observed that equality of condition, though it has not there reached the extreme limit which it seems to have attained in the United States, is constantly approaching it; and that the democracy which governs the American communities appears to be rapidly rising into power in Europe.
Hence I conceived the idea of the book that is now before the reader.
It is evident to all alike that a great democratic revolution is going on among us, but all do not look at it in the same light. To some it appears to be novel but accidental, and, as such, they hope it may still be checked; to others it seems irresistible, because it is the most uniform, the most ancient, and the most permanent tendency that is to be found in history....
There is one country in the world where the great social revolution that I am speaking of seems to have nearly reached its natural limits. It has been effected with ease and simplicity; say rather that this country is reaping the fruits of the democratic revolution which we are undergoing, without having had the revolution itself.
The emigrants who colonized the shores of America in the beginning of the seventeenth century somehow separated the democratic principle from all the principles that it had to contend with in the old communities of Europe, and transplanted it alone to the New World. It has there been able to spread in perfect freedom and peaceably to determine the character of the laws by influencing the manners of the country. It appears to me beyond a doubt that, sooner or later, we shall arrive, like the Americans, at an almost complete equality of condition. But I do not conclude from this that we shall ever be necessarily led to draw the same political consequences which the Americans have derived from a similar social organization. I am far from supposing that they have chosen the only form of government which a democracy may adopt; but as the generating cause of laws and manners in the two countries is the same, it is of immense interest for us to know what it has produced in each of them.
It is not, then, merely to satisfy a curiosity, however legitimate,
that I have examined America; my wish has been to find there instruction
by which we may ourselves profit. Whoever should imagine that I have intended
to write a panegyric would be strangely mistaken, and on reading this book
he will perceive that such was not my design; nor has it been my object
to advocate any form of government in particular, for I am of the opinion
that absolute perfection is rarely to be found in any system of laws. I
have not even pretended to judge whether the social revolution, which I
believe to be irresistible, is advantageous or prejudicial to mankind.
I have acknowledged this revolution as a fact already accomplished, or
on the eve of its accomplishment; and I have selected the nation, from
among those which have undergone it, in which its development has been
the most peaceful and the most complete, in order to discern its natural
consequences and to find out, if possible, the means of rendering it profitable
to mankind. I confess that in America I saw more than America; I sought
there the image of democracy itself, with its inclinations, its character,
its prejudices, and its passions, in order to learn what we have to fear
or to hope from its progress....
ORIGIN OF THE ANGLO-AMERICANS, AND IMPORTANCE OF THIS ORIGIN IN RELATION TO THEIR FUTURE CONDITION
If we were able to go back to the elements of states and to examine the oldest monuments of their history, I doubt not that we should discover in them the primal cause of the prejudices, the habits, the ruling passions, and, in short, all that constitutes what is called the national character. We should there find the explanation of certain customs which now seem at variance with the prevailing manners; of such laws as conflict with established principles; and of such incoherent opinions as are here and there to be met with in society, like those fragments of broken chains which we sometimes see hanging from the vaults of an old edifice, supporting nothing. This might explain the destinies of certain nations which seem borne on by an unknown force to ends of which they themselves are ignorant. But hitherto facts have been lacking for such a study: the spirit of analysis has come upon nations only as they matured; and when they at last conceived of contemplating their origin, time had already obscured it, or ignorance and pride had surrounded it with fables behind which the truth was hidden.
America is the only country in which it has been possible to witness
the natural and tranquil growth of society, and where the influence exercised
on the future condition of states by their origin is clearly distinguishable....
SOCIAL CONDITION OF THE ANGLO-AMERICANS
Many important observations suggest themselves upon the social condition of the Anglo-Americans; but there is one that takes precedence of all the rest. The social condition of the Americans is eminently democratic; this was its character at the foundation of the colonies, and it is still more strongly marked at the present day....
I do not mean that there is any lack of wealthy individuals in the United States; I know of no country, indeed, where the love of money has taken stronger hold on the affections of men and where a profounder contempt is expressed for the theory of the permanent equality of property. But wealth circulates with inconceivable rapidity, and experience shows that it is rare to find two succeeding generations in the full enjoyment of it....
In America most of the rich men were formerly poor; most of those who now enjoy leisure were absorbed in business during their youth; the consequence of this is that when they might have had a taste for study, they had no time for it, and when the time is at their disposal, they have no longer the inclination. There is no class, then, in America, in which the taste for intellectual pleasures is transmitted with hereditary fortune and leisure and by which the labors of the intellect are held in honor. Accordingly, there is an equal want of the desire and the power of application to these objects.
THE political consequences of such a social condition as this are easily deducible.
It is impossible to believe that equality will not eventually find its way into the political world, as it does everywhere else. To conceive of men remaining forever unequal upon a single point, yet equal on all others, is impossible; they must come in the end to be equal upon all.
Now, I know of only two methods of establishing equality in the political world; rights must be given to every citizen, or none at all to anyone. For nations which are arrived at the same stage of social existence as the Anglo-Americans, it is, therefore, very difficult to discover a medium between the sovereignty of all and the absolute power of one man: and it would be vain to deny that the social condition which I have been describing is just as liable to one of these consequences as to the other....
From the same social position, then, nations may derive one or the other of two great political results; these results are extremely different from each other, but they both proceed from the same cause.
The Anglo-Americans are the first nation who, having been exposed to
this formidable alternative, have been happy enough to escape the dominion
of absolute power. They have been allowed by their circumstances, their
origin, their intelligence, and especially by their morals to establish
and maintain the sovereignty of the people....
POLITICAL ASSOCIATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
In no country in the world has the principle of association been more successfully used or applied to a greater multitude of objects than in America. Besides the permanent associations which are established by law under the names of townships, cities, and counties, a vast number of others are formed and maintained by the agency of private individuals....
I shall have occasion hereafter to show the effects of association in civil life; I confine myself for the present to the political world. When once the right of association is recognized, the citizens may use it in different ways.
An association consists simply in the public assent which a number of individuals give to certain doctrines and in the engagement which they contract to promote in a certain manner the spread of those doctrines. The right of associating in this fashion almost merges with freedom of the press, but societies thus formed possess more authority than the press. When an opinion is represented by a society, it necessarily assumes a more exact and explicit form. It numbers its partisans and engages them in its cause; they, on the other hand, become acquainted with one another, and their zeal is increased by their number. An association unites into one channel the efforts of divergent minds and urges them vigorously towards the one end which it clearly points out.
The second degree in the exercise of the right of association is the power of meeting. When an association is allowed to establish centers of action at certain important points in the country, its activity is increased and its influence extended. Men have the opportunity of seeing one another; means of execution are combined; and opinions are maintained with a warmth and energy that written language can never attain.
Lastly, in the exercise of the right of political association there
is a third degree: the partisans of an opinion may unite in electoral bodies
and choose delegates to represent them in a central assembly. This is,
properly speaking, the application of the representative system to a party.
UNLIMITED POWER OF THE MAJORITY IN THE UNITED STATES, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
The very essence of democratic government consists in the absolute sovereignty of the majority; for there is nothing in democratic states that is capable of resisting it. Most of the American constitutions have sought to increase this natural strength of the majority by artificial means.
Of all political institutions, the legislature is the one that is most easily swayed by the will of the majority. The Americans determined that the members of the legislature should be elected by the people directly, and for a very brief term, in order to subject them, not only to the general convictions, but even to the daily passions, of their constituents. The members of both houses are taken from the same classes in society and nominated in the same manner; so that the movements of the legislative bodies are almost as rapid, and quite as irresistible, as those of a single assembly....
In America the authority exercised by the legislatures is supreme; nothing prevents them from accomplishing their wishes with celerity and with irresistible power, and they are supplied with new representatives every year. That is to say, the circum- stances which contribute most powerfully to democratic instability, and which admit of the free application of caprice to the most important objects, are here in full operation. Hence America is, at the present day, the country beyond all others where laws last the shortest time. Almost all the American constitutions have been amended within thirty years; there is therefore not one American state which has not modified the principles of its legislation in that time. As for the laws themselves, a single glance at the archives of the different states of the Union suffices to convince one that in America the activity of the legislator never slackens. Not that the American democracy is naturally less stable than any other, but it is allowed to follow, in the formation of the laws, the natural instability of its desires.
The omnipotence of the majority and the rapid as well as absolute manner in which its decisions are executed in the United States not only render the law unstable, but exercise the same influence upon the execution of the law and the conduct of the administration. As the majority is the only power that it is important to court, all its projects are taken up with the greatest ardor; but no sooner is its attention distracted than all this ardor ceases; while in the free states of Europe, where the administration is at once independent and secure, the projects of the legislature continue to be executed even when its attention is directed to other objects....
I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind
and real freedom of discussion as in America. In any constitutional state
in Europe every sort of religious and political theory may be freely preached
and disseminated; for there is no country in Europe so subdued by any single
authority as not to protect the man who raises his voice in the cause of
truth from the consequences of his hardihood. If he is unfortunate enough
to live under an absolute government, the people are often on his side;
if he inhabits a free country, he can, if necessary, find a shelter behind
the throne. The aristocratic part of society supports him in some countries,
and the democracy in others. But in a nation where democratic institutions
exist, organized like those of the United States, there is but one authority,
one element of strength and success, with nothing beyond it.
OF INDIVIDUALISM IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES
I have shown how it is that in ages of equality every man seeks for his opinions within himself; I am now to show how it is that in the same ages all his feelings are turned towards himself alone. Individualism is a novel expression, to which a novel idea has given birth. Our fathers were only acquainted with egoisme (selfishness). Selfishness is a passionate and exaggerated love of self, which leads a man to connect everything with himself and to prefer himself to everything in the world. Individualism is a mature and calm feeling, which disposes each member of the community to sever himself from the mass of his fellows and to draw apart with his family and his friends, so that after he has thus formed a little circle of his own, he willingly leaves society at large to itself. Selfishness originates in blind instinct; individualism proceeds from erroneous judgment more than from depraved feelings; it originates as much in deficiencies of mind as in perversity of heart.
Selfishness blights the germ of all virtue; individualism, at first, only saps the virtues of public life; but in the long run it attacks and destroys all others and is at length absorbed in downright selfishness. Selfishness is a vice as old as the world, which does not belong to one form of society more than to another; individualism is of democratic origin, and it threatens to spread in the same ratio as the equality of condition.
Among aristocratic nations, as families remain for centuries in the same condition, often on the same spot, all generations become, as it were, contemporaneous. A man almost always knows his forefathers and respects them; he thinks he already sees his remote descendants and he loves them. He willingly imposes duties on himself towards the former and the latter, and he will frequently sacrifice his personal gratifications to those who went before and to those who will come after him. Aristocratic institutions, moreover, have the effect of closely binding every man to several of his fellow citizens. As the classes of an aristocratic people are strongly marked and permanent, each of them is regarded by its own members as a sort of lesser country, more tangible and more cherished than the country at large. As in aristocratic communities all the citizens occupy fixed positions, one above another, the result is that each of them always sees a man above himself whose patronage is necessary to him, and below himself another man whose co-operation he may claim. Men living in aristocratic ages are therefore almost always closely attached to something placed out of their own sphere, and they are often disposed to forget themselves. It is true that in these ages the notion of human fellowship is faint and that men seldom think of sacrificing themselves for mankind; but they often sacrifice themselves for other men. In democratic times, on the contrary, when the duties of each individual to the race are much more clear, devoted service to any one man becomes more rare; the bond of human affection is extended, but it is relaxed.
Among democratic nations new families are constantly springing up, others are constantly falling away, and all that remain change their condition; the woof of time is every instant broken and the track of generations effaced. Those who went before are soon forgotten; of those who will come after, no one has any idea: the interest of man is confined to those in close propinquity to himself. As each class gradually approaches others and mingles with them, its members become undifferentiated and lose their class identity for each other. Aristocracy had made a chain of all the members of the community, from the peasant to the king; democracy breaks that chain and severs every link of it.
As social conditions become more equal, the number of persons increases who, although they are neither rich nor powerful enough to exercise any great influence over their fellows, have nevertheless acquired or retained sufficient education and fortune to satisfy their own wants. They owe nothing to any man, they expect nothing from any man; they acquire the habit of always considering themselves as standing alone, and they are apt to imagine that their whole destiny is in their own hands.
Thus not only does democracy make every man forget his ancestors, but
it hides his descendants and separates his contemporaries from him; it
throws him back forever upon himself alone and threatens in the end to
confine him entirely within the solitude of his own heart.
HOW THE AMERICANS COMBAT INDIVIDUALISM BY THE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-INTEREST RIGHTLY UNDERSTOOD
I have already shown, in several parts of this work, by what means the inhabitants of the United States almost always manage to combine their own advantage with that of their fellow citizens; my present purpose is to point out the general rule that enables them to do so. In the United States hardly anybody talks of the beauty of virtue, but they maintain that virtue is useful and prove it every day. The American moralists do not profess that men ought to sacrifice themselves for their fellow creatures because it is noble to make such sacrifices, but they boldly aver that such sacrifices are as necessary to him who imposes them upon himself as to him for whose sake they are made....
The Americans, on the other hand, are fond of explaining almost all the actions of their lives by the principle of self-interest rightly understood; they show with complacency how an enlightened regard for themselves constantly prompts them to assist one another and inclines them willingly to sacrifice a portion of their time and property to the welfare of the state. In this respect I think they frequently fail to do themselves justice, for in the United States as well as elsewhere people are sometimes seen to give way to those disinterested and spontaneous impulses that are natural to man; but the Americans seldom admit that they yield to emotions of this kind; they are more anxious to do honor to their philosophy than to themselves....
The principle of self-interest rightly understood is not a lofty one, but it is clear and sure. It does not aim at mighty objects, but it attains without excessive exertion all those at which it aims. As it lies within the reach of all capacities, everyone can without difficulty learn and retain it. By its admirable conformity to human weaknesses it easily obtains great dominion; nor is that dominion precarious, since the principle checks one personal interest by another, and uses, to direct the passions, the very same instrument that excites them.
The principle of self-interest rightly understood produces no great acts of self-sacrifice, but it suggests daily small acts of self-denial. By itself it cannot suffice to make a man virtuous; but it disciplines a number of persons in habits of regularity, temperance, moderation, foresight, self- command; and if it does not lead men straight to virtue by the will, it gradually draws them in that direction by their habits. If the principle of interest rightly understood were to sway the whole moral world, extraordinary virtues would doubtless be more rare; but I think that gross depravity would then also be less common. The principle of interest rightly understood perhaps prevents men from rising far above the level of mankind, but a great number of other men, who were falling far below it, are caught and restrained by it. Observe some few individuals, they are lowered by it; survey mankind, they are raised.
I am not afraid to say that the principle of self-interest rightly understood appears to me the best suited of all philosophical theories to the wants of the men of our time, and that I regard it as their chief remaining security against themselves. Towards it, therefore, the minds of the moralists of our age should turn; even should they judge it to be incomplete, it must nevertheless be adopted as necessary.