From kbowma1@gl.umbc.edu Thu Mar 26 18:01:40 1998
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 15:10:12 -0500 (EST)
From: katherine bowman <kbowma1@gl.umbc.edu>
To: miller@umbc.edu
Subject: Hydology data


I was out of town and just got around to checking my e-mail last night.  
Anyway, here is the data I have on the Miller and Yolo soils:

Miller Soil, w=1, theta-0=0.22
time ponding= 8.84 hrs

Miller soil, w=2, theta-0=0.32
time ponding= 0.86 hr.
	
time	f(t)
0.855	2.00
1.008	1.80
1.309	1.56
1.648	1.4
2.022	1.28
2.426	1.2
2.855	1.13
3.308	1.08
3.782	1.04
4.274	1.00
4.782	0.97
5.306	0.94
5.843	0.92
5.999	0.91	
 
Miller soil, w=3, theta-0=0.42
time ponding = 0.17 hr.

time	f(t)
0.174	3
0.385	1.85
0.696	1.44
1.075	1.23
1.507	1.10
1.98	1.02
2.487	0.96
3.022	0.91
3.580	0.88
4.159	0.85	
4.755	0.83
5.366	0.81
5.999	0.79

Yolo soil, w=1, theta-0=0.22
time ponding= 0.29 hr

time	f(t)
0.29	1.00
0.571	0.60
1.083	0.41
1.775	0.32
2.635	0.27
3.227	0.24
3.652	0.23
4.571	0.21
5.064	0.20
5.580	0.19
5.999	0.18

Yolo soil, w=2, theta-0=0.32
time ponding = 0.05 hr

time	f(t)
0.045	2.00
0.131	0.93
0.445	0.49
0.672	0.40
0.944	0.34
1.614	0.27
2.441	0.22
3.411	0.19
4.516	0.17
5.115	0.16
5.999	0.15

Yolo soil, w=3, theta-0 = 0.42
time ponding = 0.01 hr

time	f(t)
0.009	3.00
0.02	1.61
0.066	0.83
0.242	0.44
0.52	0.31
0.893	0.24
1.35	0.20
1.884	0.18	
2.490	0.16
3.161	0.14
3.893	0.13
4.681	0.12
5.521	0.12
5.999	0.11

I also compared the numbers that Megan sent for the cumulative infilt.,
runoff etc. with my data.  They are almost identical to the data I have-
maybe just a decimal point difference here or there, so I am not sending
those.  If there is anything else I need to send, just let me know,
Katie