|
Webquest |
|
Higher Education for Illegal Immigrants in Maryland |
|
Conclusion |
|
To review this project, you will jigsaw to meet with individuals from other groups your same role and discuss the following questions. Be sure to record notes from your conversation to turn in. NOTE: You do not need to answer all questions. These are prompts to get your conversation moving. Process ¨ Do you feel that your proposal adequately addressed the Quest? ¨ How was your role dealt with in your group? How did other members respond to you? Was your role more valued or less valued than others? Why? ¨ What did you like about the policy-making process? Dislike? ¨ Was there information or a particular perspective that your group found particularly important? Why? ¨ What impediments did you encounter in your policy-making process that you have observed in politics today? ¨ What assets do lobbyists bring to the conversation? How about policy analysts and others who have factual, and usually unbiased, information? ¨ What role does the media play in the policy making process? ¨ Should policy makers consider actions in other states? Why or why not? ¨ Were you happy with the final outcome in the group? ¨ If your group compromised, what was that process like?
After-thoughts ¨ Setting your role aside, how did your perspective on this issue change? ¨ What impacts does this policy issue have on Maryland and its citizens? ¨ How do you foresee this issue being dealt with by Maryland legislators? ¨ How can you, as a student, become active in this process?
Reflection You will be asked to complete a reflection upon this experience. Consider the above questions in your response. Reflection is not to exceed three pages double-spaced.
|
|
Josh Michael |
