"Writing in the matrix" by Michael Day

 
Home
Syllabus
Assessment Paper
Book Review
Collaborative Presentations
Daily Plans
Newspapers
Technology Access
Textual Analysis
Web page Assignment
Web Evaluations
Writing in the Matrix

  1. Find and join a discussion group relevant to your discipline.
  1. After joining a group, monitor the discussion this week to understand the expectations of the group and the discourse conventions (intense audience analysis-examine messages for shared discourse conventions, shared knowledge, rhetorical strategies)
  1. Post a message in one of these categories: requesting information, answering questions and consulting for others, gathering facts and opinions, conducting the job search
  1. Critique each other’s posts 

a.       author of message to individual or group sends his message to classmate for help revising

b.       classmate responds, comments on grammar, style, technical content, tone

c.       original author revises, copies to instructor

  1. Lessons learned:
  •  Students are introduced to and have an opportunity to comment on, virtual communities

  • Learn give and take of virtual communities

  • "Build communication skills, build valuable social capital, networked collaborators exchange knowledge capital (information) for social capital (goodwill and respect from others)"p. 158

  • Learn about transitional nature of communication

  • Way to share information and experiences

  • Learn to make intelligent, well-written requests for information, perceptions of audience expectations because it is not required; it"places emphasis on ethos building evaluative eyes of outside audience"p. 161

  1. Benefits of writing in the matrix:
  • Natural heuristic encourages investigation, new ideas

  • New model of collaboration-distances do not matter-tapping living databases

  • Situates students within professional fields

  • Provides focus for discussions of ethos-creates persona of professional writer

  • Students understand "importance of professional presentation to reputations of both individuals and organizations" (p. 161)